Xentry Interface: J2534 PassThru Device Compatibility Test

Xentry diagnostic software requires a compatible interface for communication with Mercedes-Benz vehicles. This article presents test results for various J2534 PassThru devices, evaluating their performance with Xentry. Each device was assessed based on battery status, communication speed (duration of 5 steps), and the number of control units identified.

Xentry Interface Compatibility Test Results

The following J2534 PassThru devices were tested for compatibility with Xentry:

1. DICE (Volvo_VCI): Battery OK; 1 min 44 sec (5 steps); 22 modules identified.

2. Openport 2.0 (R1 replaced with 47k): Battery OK; 0 min 57 sec (5 steps); 41 modules identified. (Note: Replacing resistor R1 with a 47k resistor improves performance and prevents overheating.)

3. VAS 5054A: Battery NOT OK; 0 min 55 sec (5 steps); 41 modules (SAK or SAF-XC161CJ-16F40F controller); 32 modules (SAK-XC167CI-XXXX controller).

4. Mini-VCI for Toyota (generic): Battery NOT OK; 2 min 10 sec (5 steps); 20 modules identified.

5. Scanmatik: Battery OK; 1 min 01 sec (5 steps); 41 modules identified.

6. Scanmatik 2 PRO USB: Battery OK; 0 min 51 sec (5 steps); 50 modules identified.

7. Scanmatik 2 PRO Bluetooth: Battery OK; 2 min 41 sec (5 steps); 50 modules identified.

8. GM MDI: Battery OK; 1 min 05 sec (5 steps); 41 modules identified.

9. Bosch KTS 560: Battery OK; 1 min 05 sec (5 steps); 33 modules identified.

10. Mongoose Pro: Battery OK; 1 min 13 sec (5 steps); 41 modules identified.

11. Dialink J2534 (blue case, STM32F105 controller): Battery OK; 41 sec (5 steps); 41 modules identified.

12. VCM II (Ford/Mazda): Battery OK; 1 min 05 sec (5 steps); 41 modules identified.

13. Bosch KTS 520 (firmware updated): Battery status not mentioned; DAS functional, reads all modules; Live Data/Outputs unsatisfactory (W245, A168, A169); Xentry incompatible with W212 and W205 (post-VIN read error).

14. Eucleia Wiscan T6 (tested with DAS/Xentry 03.2020 in Smart 451 EV): Battery OK; Fast communication; Adaptation, special functions, and programming operational.

Conclusion

These tests highlight the varying performance of different J2534 PassThru devices as Xentry Interfaces. Factors such as battery status, communication speed, and the ability to recognize control units are crucial for effective diagnostics. While several devices demonstrated good compatibility, others exhibited limitations or inconsistencies. Choosing the right xentry interface is essential for efficient and accurate vehicle diagnostics.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *